City of Atlantic City v. Trupos, 201 N.J. 447, 992 A.2d 762 (2010)
The New Jersey Supreme Court held that, for purposes of disqualifying a lawyer based on a former-client conflict, either (1) the lawyer must have received confidential information from the former client that can be used against that client in the current matter, or (2) facts relevant to the former representation must be relevant and material to the current representation.
Click on the link to view the full alert or visit the following Internet address: http://www.hinshawlaw.com/new-jersey-supreme-court-elaborates-on-meaning-of-substantially-related-matters-under-former-client-conflicts-rule-06-10-2010/